Provincial and regional
Until a few years ago provincial authorities played only a minor role in bicycle policy. Their main concern was specifically cyclist safety on and along provincial roads (being the road maintenance authority) - and in addition recreational cycling routes/bike ...
Provincial and regional
Until a few years ago provincial authorities played only a minor role in bicycle policy. Their main concern was specifically cyclist safety on and along provincial roads (being the road maintenance authority) - and in addition recreational cycling routes/bike paths (still relevant: see Regional bicycle route networks and ‘Bicycle route planners lend cycling a modern image’). Due to the extensive decentralisation processes in the nineteen nineties a considerable number of duties have been added. To the provincial workload as well as that of metropolitan districts: local authorities co-operating within a metropolitan area. Crucial to the decentralisation is the provision to local authorities of subsidies for infrastructure and exploitation of public transport. The rules that provinces and metropolitan districts may introduce in awarding the considerable amounts of money involved, may strongly affect the intensity of local bicycle policy (Directing (bicycle) traffic policy through GDU). As yet local authorities themselves appear to demand subsidies for bicycle facilities (Sustained attention for bicycle facilities).
Besides providing subsidies for local bicycle policy, provinces and metropolitan districts may also display a more intrinsic involvement, a certain degree of co-ordination. This is most important and relevant for metropolitan districts with a continuous built-up area consisting of several towns. Quite often a lot of attention is paid to a common regional bicycle network – as for instance in Haaglanden: Business-like approach favours bicycle policies. Provinces, too, may encourage local authorities to identify and use opportunities for bicycle traffic, as demonstrated by the
| Article | North Rhine Westphalia 2001 The German state North Rhine Westphalia stimulates municipal bicycle policy though a network of bicycle-friendly cities, membership to which is regulated by an expert committee. |
| Article | Sustained attention for bicycle facilities 2003 GDU, joined earmarked funds, did not result in fewer subsidies for bicycle infrastructure since its introduction in 1996. |
| Article | Directing (bicycle) traffic policy through GDU 2003 The twelve provinces and seven special administrative areas have organised their joined earmarked funds (GDU) in widely different ways. A survey. |
| Report | Regional bicycle route networks 2006 Report by SLF about advantages and disadvantages of junction signposting, with recommendations and planning checklist. |
| Article | Business-like approach favours bicycle policies 2003 The new bicycle plans for the city of Den Haag and the Haaglanden metropolitan district: specific, highly infrastructural and clear about suitable funding. |
| Article | Bicycle route planners lend cycling a modern image Ron Hendriks , Fietsverkeer 2006 Survey of the latest developments in digital route planners for cyclists: Utrecht, Zuid-Holland, Amsterdam and some German planners. |
| Article | Also stimulate bicycle use in medium long distances 2004 An analysis of the value of high quality interlocal bicycle routes: the market and (types of) initiatives. |
| Report | 'Balanced bicycle policies' 1995 A catalogue of non-infrastructural measures that may promote cycling. |

